ekov, woven together and titled Flies in the Snuff Box. In their notes on the production, directors D. Terry Petrie and Isaac Walters discuss Chekov's own view of his work as "comic satire, pointing out the unhappy nature of existence in turn-of-the-century Russia." This certainly seems to be the case, but these four scenes seem to focus on relationships (dismal ones, of course), which in some cases begin strained and turn romantic, and in others begin romantic and become strained. In either case, all the relationships are fiery and explosive, although sometimes the fierce emotions remain suppressed in the minds of those feeling them. All four scenes contain elements of chaos, as these fierce emotions (fury, love, or frustration) boil over until most of the characters onstage are screaming, or fighting, or rolling around on the floor.The first scene, “On the Harmfulness of Tobacco,” is actually a monologue broken into four parts, serving as interludes between the other three plays. Nathaniel Drew does a nice job with this as Ivan Ivanovich Niukhin, a downtrodden husband who seems trapped under the thumb of his domineering wife. Drew's
physicality and comedy is generally effective (though not perfect), and the scene itself does a nice job of connecting the other three plays. This scene also introduces the title of the evening, as Niukhin reminds us what happens to a fly when placed in a snuff box (it withers and dies), giving us a glimpse into his own life, trapped and suffocating in his marriage.The next scene, “The Bear,” is the story of a grieving widow who initially despises, then succumbs to the charms of, a man coming to collect a debt. Jeremy J. Minagro does a great job as the aggressive and arrogant suitor--his performance is confident and engaging. Penny Pendleton is less effective as the grieving widow; still, the scene as a whole is entertaining, and it was fun to watch this relationship progress.
The third scene, The Proposal, is probably the most successful of the evening as it combines the most consistent performances with a simple and amusing plot. Scott M. Stringham plays a suitor coming to propose to a young woman played by Elize Newton. Julie Suazo plays the girl's mother, who is thrilled by this prospect. The proposal is delayed, however, by ridiculous arguments between the would-be lovers over who owns certain parcels of land and whose dog is better. All three young actors were committed to the scene and deliver strong performances.The final one-act of the evening, The Jubilee, also contained several strong performances, yet I found the scene as a whole extremely difficult to follow. My favorite actor of the night was Britni Gibbs, a ditsy, self-absorbed socialite who arrived at a bank just in time to complicate her ambitious husband's afternoon. Gibbs' character had nothing of consequence to say, but she delivered every line with delicious passion and sincerity, and was a delight to watch. The other actors in the scene also performed well, in spite of very difficult material. I am still not entirely sure what happened in this scene, which is partly a fault of the writing, but which was exacerbated by a directorial choice to overlap much of the dialogue. The technique added to the chaos of the scene (which I'm assuming was the aim), but it was overused and left me feeling that if the characters would only speak one at a time perhaps I'd be able to understand what was going on. The scene ended in overall Noises Off-type pandemonium, which seemed a bit rushed and overdone.
All in all, this evening of one acts is worth watching. The performances are generally strong and the stories entertaining and perhaps even a bit thought-provoking. In their program notes, the directors speak of Chekov's desire that people "look at [themselves] and see how dreary [their] lives are" in the hope that they will "create another and better life for themselves." Now, I wouldn't call this play "life-changing" but it did serve as an amusing reminder to enjoy life a little more and stew over it a little less.




